Firstly lets look at the spelling:
M O S
A O S
Similarities:
They are both Operating Systems ( O S are both positioned the same)
Differences:
A & M are 13 characters apart, and mean completely different words.
A - Amiga
M - Morph
Now for the binary examination:
OS4.0 binary is incompatible to MOS x.x binary
OS3.1 binary is *emulated* 100% on MOS
OS3.1 binary is part emulated, part native on AOS4
Elaboration on 3.1 usage - 3.1 software runs faster on AOS4 than MOS x.x and migrates easier thanks to the fact that you can combine the two code bases.
Statement: MOS is NOT AOS. Because an OS can emulate another OS does not mean it deserves respect. Otherwise you would see amigans licking posters of Billy the Goat. AOS runs the full roadmap more directly than MOS ever will.
The most l33t of programmers are going the AOS way.
And here in NZ, we are setting up financial endorsements for programmers to go AOS.
Thank you for your time.
Sometimes its hard to tell if someone is joking
or is serious.. I do find it a bit funny, so okey,
Ill start laugh now. :-P :-P :-P
