By your defenition of facts then yeah.
Otherwise.. well, I didnt say 1, I didnt say 2,
actually I didnt say any of those, but its pretty close

Lets take this piece of comment for example
to show how you without any respect of facts
try to throw dirt on MOS:
And then you say that I don't have anything for why it would be irrelevant to Amiga users? Listen and listen carefully, WinUAE has better support for Amiga applications than MorphOS since it only runs retargetable Amiga applications.
So what, put UAE on MOS and run non-rtg apps.
Ontop of that, it doesn't run Amiga applications natively in any way, it emulates.
What do you think MOS does ??
Edit: What do you think WinUAE does ?
MorphOS will also not run AmigaOS4 applications and MorphOS applications won't run on any AmigaOS.
Neither will UAE, what your point ?
To sum things up:
MorphOS is an OS that doesn't run on Amiga hardware,
Yes it does, on classic PPC.
MorphOS applications won't run on AmigaOS and emulation is required in order for it to run Amiga applications. Per definition that makes it a non Amiga compatible (or even related) OS.
Yeah, same can be said of UAE. Again Whats your point ?
Pegasos is hardware not capable of running AmigaOS natively which makes it easy to define as non Amiga hardware.
But Amithlon/UAE is better then ?? What ?
So, tell me; why would this be more Amiga relevant than WinUAE?
Because unlike UAE, its not JUST an emulator..
-- well, not a single line that provides any real arguments against MOS.