Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Emulators better than the real thing?  (Read 11261 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rdolores

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 195
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.rdolores.com
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« on: August 10, 2007, 04:01:40 PM »
For apps that do not use the Amiga's custom chips, ie Workbench friendly, emulation may be better because it can take advantage of the latest hardware, ie newer Video Modes via Picasso96 and newer Sound Cards via AHI. Also, it is cheaper and easier to set up more modern things like Ethernet, Internet, CD-Burners, USB devices, etc...

However, apps that depend on Amiga's custom chips, especially Sound apps that need Paula, the real thing cannot be duplicated exactly. So sounds/music can sound different in emulation.

I use WinUAE for emulation on my WinXP machine and it's quite amazing. I also have Amithlon on a PIII-1000 machine which is really amazing. But I still keep my classics (see my sig) and use them once in a while.
A1000 - 2 Floppies, 2 MB RAM, OS 1.0-1.3
A500 - 170 MB HD, 8 MB RAM, OS 1.3/2.04
A2000 - 350 MB HD, 8 MB RAM, A2630, OS 2.04
A2500 - 540 MB HD, 8 MB RAM, A2630, OS 3.9
A1200 - 20 GB HD, 64 MB RAM, Blizzard IV
Amithlon - 49 GB HD, 768 MB RAM, PIII-1G
AROS - 80 GB HD, 2 GB RAM, P4-3.2GHz