Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: OS 4.0 comes to New York! - Updated: New Address  (Read 6515 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline boing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 293
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.TribeOfHeart.org
Re: OS 4.0 comes to New York!
« on: August 05, 2003, 10:44:43 AM »
What i'm curious to see is how the various PPC system emulating a real Amiga compare to the x86-based Amiga emulators.  In terms of speed, flexibility and reliability.  If one can get x86 boards for cheaper and run an Amiga emulator on it that's as fast or faster, then I hate to say it, but there goes a big reason to go with a PPC solution.  Word that OS4.0 is kinda slow- even on a 66MHz PPC, let alone more modern PPCs... well that's just depressing.

Now if the new "Amiga" had some special hardware that gave it clear advantages over the emulations- even just a way to assist AGA compatibility or emulation, then we'd have a good reason to stick with the corporate plan.  

 As it stands, we have no compatible hardware (at all! neither processor nor chipset),  When it comes to that point, one has to ask if there's any benefit in going with AI's plan, as opposed to say, X86 running an emulator.  Sad but true.  Nobody hates x86 more than me.  But one has to ask where the benefit is in paying more for a system that's no faster  at running existing Amiga programs than wintel running UAE or similar.
 

Offline boing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 293
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.TribeOfHeart.org
Re: OS 4.0 comes to New York!
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2003, 10:57:07 AM »
>Much of the code I believe has been ported from assembler to C.


Cripes.  Weren't these Amiga Inc guys around in 1990 to remember how the transition from Assem to C caused 2.04 to be slower than 1.3?  C has proven to be nowhere near as portable as the hype of the early 80's promised, and it sure as heck is harder to deal with, and the compilers out there aren't even close to what could theoretically be reached (in terms of creating executables that are lean and fast).

Come on people.  Get yourselves some cross-assemblers if you have to.  Relying on a compiler to create fast code has always been a mistake.  Sure if you could trade speedy executables for faster development time, it might be worth it in a pinch.  But it's been over a decade and everybody is still struggling with C portability issues.  C is crap.  Stick a fork in it.

BTW the Apple community has several fast 68K emulators.  So why are we reinventing the wheel instead of licensing one of them?