I think Asian1 raises legit questions. In 2002 my girlfriend ordered AmigaOS 3.9 for me (Xmas gift) from the Amiga.com AmigaMall. I never showed up. Emails to them about the matter went unanswered. As long as Fleecy and Bill are involved with "the Amiga" I'm uneasy.
LA ethics or not, the business card incident looked bad. I think Hare's explanation was plausible, but it still didn't look good. It could be interpreted as a lack of judgement thing.
I think it's cool that Cecelia will check that address for us. BTW we really don't have any proof that anybody at the address said several bits of Amiga mail had gone there. It's an unattributed non-quote.
Anyway I'd like to know more about that article I read that said a German court ruled that Gateway never actually got ownership of the Amiga's OS. And so that would affect everybody on down the line.
