Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig ( Pics!!! )  (Read 19806 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« on: August 09, 2008, 09:58:24 PM »
Have a look at the hardware flaws I found:
http://www.opencircuits.com/Minimig_Board_v1.0_issues

Esp, the SD/MMC "or"-gate.

@trekiej: It seems the ASus Eee PC 7" TFT screen can be had for 84 EUR (including VAT) and it works with a digital parallell RGB interface. So it would fit directly on the Minimig video output. Provided sync rates are taken into account. So if the resistor D/A colour and sync signals get some solder pads it's easy to attach the 7" flat display. The 9" seems work in the same way.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2008, 10:53:13 PM »
I think I have to make a distinction. Usually "LCD" means black/grey screns like the ones on wristwatches. TFT are the popular colour ones used today.

A pin header might be good. Just make sure it's possible to easily desolder the pin header. Because it might cause EMI. Esp if there's any stubs, ie the resistor D/A versus pin header. Electronics is tricky ;)

Asus Eee TFT screen link:
http://www.asusparts.eu/index.php?cPath=1880_1886_1892_2370
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2008, 05:38:36 AM »
Socket = EMI issues. Better to have an FPGA with more logics. Which makes it possible with softcore 68020+AGA etc..
I think however this is just a bugfix version. Rather than the next step.
And larger FPGA means BGA at this point (except for XC3S500E).
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2008, 02:02:27 AM »
@yaqube:
Less complex components, less cost, less soldering mayham. So if the present MCU (PIC) can't handle FAT16 then we might create a small MCU with large memory inside the FPGA that does handle the non-boot stuff.
Btw, I definitly like your switch to DRAM, hopefully it's bugfree too ;)
(DRAM is tricky)  

The SDRAM pinout might differ. But then you can also totally reconfigure the i/o pins to accomplish the new task. And thus wire the SDRAM to the pcb pads for the SRAM.

@Illuwatar:
Do you think it's possible to shrink the actually used area on the pcb such that any would-be-laptop-hackers can cut the board into a smaller form factor to fit a mini laptop. While still keeping the Mini-ITX formfactor.
Using same pcb for both users = less costs.
But I guess the board is as compact as it's possible to make it.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2008, 10:30:37 AM »
In that case just do the hardware bugs errata. But I think the ARM CPU will just increase the cost in the end. FAT16 handling can be done with an FPGA softcore MCU.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2008, 11:50:43 PM »
I would bet on Gerber ;)
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2008, 11:01:12 AM »
Maybe you could utilise already used backplates on existing PCs ..?
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show all replies
Re: Interest check: An updated MiniITX-MiniMig
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2008, 04:24:24 AM »
Check other I/Os?, esp short circuits. Or driven lines.