Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Dragon, lack of performance  (Read 3620 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline _yak_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 227
    • Show all replies
Re: Dragon, lack of performance
« on: November 12, 2006, 11:44:19 PM »
Since it was my post that was quoted I would just like to point out that this is just a translation of things I saw posted on polish ppa.pl site. It was explicitly mentioned, that they didn't saw any tests but it was stated by Elbox representative.
 

Offline _yak_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 227
    • Show all replies
Re: Dragon, lack of performance
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2006, 12:00:45 PM »
I've gathered some things that was said by Elbox in the first two videos. I've posted this here.
 

Offline _yak_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 227
    • Show all replies
Re: Dragon, lack of performance
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2006, 01:53:47 PM »
@Crumb

The drawers were on a flash pen-drive. However, it was said that it runs at Hi-Speed (USB 2.0). I don't know how fast it should be, I'm just a messenger :).

@CannonFodder

I think the reason they thought about AROS was to compile it for CF directly (to gain its max speed), if they want a 68k OS, they have AmigaOS.
 

Offline _yak_

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 227
    • Show all replies
Re: Dragon, lack of performance
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2006, 05:30:01 PM »
@humppa

Quote
Btw, was there any estimated price mentioned already?

Again, it was reported on PPA.pl that Elbox said during the meeting that the prices on their website are correct, i.e. 349 EUR (VAT excluded). The website also mentions some special offers for Mediator users.

BTW, I speak that language but would not risk making any statement regarding performance too :D. Let's wait for some real benchmarks.