Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Emulators better than the real thing?  (Read 10551 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stopthegop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 831
    • Show all replies
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« on: August 07, 2007, 03:09:06 AM »
I would run an emulated Amiga with the same enthusiasm as I'd have driving an emulated Porsche.  
Primary:
A4000T. Phase5 PPC604e-233mhz/060-66mhz. Mediator, Z3 Fastlane, Voodoo5, Delfina, X-Surf, AD516, Peggy Plus.

Collection:
A4000D, A1200, A500, Milan060 (Atari clone), Atari MegaSTE, Atari TT030, C64, C128, Mattel Aquarius, (2) HP Jornada....
 

Offline stopthegop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 831
    • Show all replies
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2007, 11:44:36 AM »
Quote
on the other hand, there are places where it is still needs improving.



For starters, how about sh1tcanning its dependence on windoze?  It takes two operating systems to accomplish what a real Amiga does with one and its resource requirements are obscene.  
Primary:
A4000T. Phase5 PPC604e-233mhz/060-66mhz. Mediator, Z3 Fastlane, Voodoo5, Delfina, X-Surf, AD516, Peggy Plus.

Collection:
A4000D, A1200, A500, Milan060 (Atari clone), Atari MegaSTE, Atari TT030, C64, C128, Mattel Aquarius, (2) HP Jornada....