Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Picasso IV: P96 or CGFX?  (Read 1879 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline McVencoTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 1428
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigascene.nl
Picasso IV: P96 or CGFX?
« on: October 29, 2007, 01:39:00 PM »
The A4000T that I picked up last weekend came with a Picasso IV (woohoo! finally got one!) and Picasso96 installed.
It all works fine (I haven't tried much yet), but I was just curious if there are any pros/cons or major differences between the Picasso96 or CybergraphX software packages. Can I install them both to try out the differences?
Are there any specific programs which will *only* work with one of the packages and not with the other?
Is there anywhere where I can find detailed info on both packages?

And about the P-IV itself: I also haven't checked which version I currently have, but what is the latest firmware version available?

Yeah, lotsa questions, but any helpful answer is appreciated :-)
| A4000 | CS-MK3 060@50 | Picasso IV |
| Member of Team Amiga (tm) | FidoNet 2:286/414.18 (long ago) |
| SysOp The Missing Channel BBS | Member of AGA BBS Intl. |
 

Offline McVencoTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 1428
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigascene.nl
Re: Picasso IV: P96 or CGFX?
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2007, 02:27:38 PM »
Quote
mdivancic wrote:

I prefer CGX4, but I've found P96 works better with OS 3.1. I've got the following setups:

Picasso II on OS 3.1 running P96
Picasso IV on OS 3.9 running CyberGraphicX 4


In what way does p96 work better with 3.1? And why do you prefer CGX?

I'd like to hear some reasons/facts/experiences (good or bad), not just opinions! :lol:
| A4000 | CS-MK3 060@50 | Picasso IV |
| Member of Team Amiga (tm) | FidoNet 2:286/414.18 (long ago) |
| SysOp The Missing Channel BBS | Member of AGA BBS Intl. |