There is some credible but inconclusive evidence that NASA did not visit the moon. There are moon photos that appear doctored, questions of how film and astronauts made it unharmed through the Van Allen radiation belt and several mysterious deaths of people in the know. Faking it would have increased American "patriotism" with a fraction of the spending and problems fighting the Cold War. It's probably all a coincidence but knowing that our politicians and the CIA are capable of assassinations, false flag attacks on our cities (to start a war with Cuba) and spying and framing of even U.S. citizens for false crimes, I haven't ruled it out. We are supposed to be the good guys and yet some of the things our Obama-nation is still doing makes Steve Jobs look like a saint.
I don't see any advantage to trashing Steve Jobs reputation. It is what it is. He was an odd ball but influential from a product development and marketing standpoint. He was a successful visionary judging by sales although it's much easier to make money after you have it. Apple with Jobs in power has been one of the few companies to do well with quality products in the American market where cheap products usually do better. I have more respect for the influential visionaries that understood computers like Jay Miner and Dennis Ritchie. They made lasting contributions to the development of computers (and the benefit of mankind as well as the detriment) without the money catalyst.
Disclosure: I own AAPL in a retirement account.
If you stayed in the most intense area of the Van Allen for a few days you will die. Of course the astronauts were traveling 7 or 8 miles a second so they got a minor dose in the few minutes they were in the high radiation zone (and few hours they were in the lower radiation area). This and the dozen or so other "questions" have been answered many times by experts. I think Phil Plaitt (sp) has a break down of the common ones.
