"This site reflects its users and maybe thats the problem...nobody micro manages it and nobody "really' censors it... users submit news, users post int he forums, companies with money pay for add space, etc etc etc.... if you consider it biased maybe its the community that is biased and not the site!..."
That's just bullshiit. I was really surprised by this. I've allways thought of this site as the unbiased place. It doesn't matter if the community runs it or not. The community could run it and some people still be unbiased, and that's what this proves. I visit Amigaworld.net as I visit any other Amiga site, and the simple fact that someone filtered it's name clearly shows how unbiased some moderators are. And a site can NOT be unbiased with biased moderators. Not talking about all moderators of couse. But if you look at some news/titles forums in the past you clearly see that if same things were posted about the other camp, and in the same manner, they would probably be moderated. But then again there doesn't seem to be a similar drive in the other camp to try to trash everything, so one cannot say for sure.
