Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?  (Read 2728 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lockon_15

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2006
  • Posts: 304
    • Show all replies
Re: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?
« on: September 12, 2009, 12:17:27 PM »
Quote from: tone007;522813
The white on blue reminds me of high contast color themes for the visually impaired.

Yes, but that same conclusion was also valid back then in 1985.
High contrast color theme for default WB1.x setup was done intentionally, to make fonts more readable and put less stress on eye muscles.
 
Just one of nice proofs how Jay and original team were clever.
I always set my WB3.1 theme to a close match of one found in WB1.3.... that blue/white is part of original, golden era look & feel.
A500+/KS3.1/GVPA530/2MbChipRam+8MbFastRAM 2GbCF/YAMAHA CDRW