Well, you'd think people would all understand.
If I read some of the negative BS that Wayne Hunt has been posting on Moo Bunny....
Let's set the record straight here once again:
1. 30 developers work on OS 4, EACH IN HIS RESPECTIVE FIELD OF EXPERTISE.
This means that work on a HDToolbox replacement doesn't hold up work on the kernel, 68K emulation, 2D drivers, salvage and recovery tools, TCP/IP stack, device drivers etc.
2. Only very few aspectsof OS 4 lend themselves to visualisation
How do you propose we make screenshots of a kernel, a 2D driver, a filesystem, salvage and recovery tools, devices, a USB stack etc.?
3. The functionality of HDToolbox was too limited and it was in fact buggy in some places because it could not deal with certain types of controllers and drives.
All of this constitues sufficient justification for a replacement, especially if you consider the fact that H&P did not fact give us access to the HD Toolbox source-code they did for 3.5.
So snap out of it Wayne.