>Which doesn't mean that you haven't even looked at it, >which would be really hard to believe (in other words, I >wouldn't believe you if you told me that you never ever >LOOKED at the AROS source code).
Quite frankly I could care less what you believe.
Why would we look at the AROS codebase when we have the entire OS 3.x codebase sitting in a CVS barring a few minor additions by H&P themselves?
If you are Fabio Allemagna, the self-styled GPL Warrior who doesn't even understand the GPL himself, I'm not surprised to see that contrived reasoning you come up with next.
Get a life Fabio.
You know as well as I do that AROS is not fully binary compatible with OS 3.1.