D00kie wrote:
Agreed. 3.5 was cack. I write some Amiga software and have to do a bit of support to get it to work on 3.5, while it runs flawlessly on 3.9.
I don't think they debugged it at all, IMHO...
3.5 hasn't given me any problems at all. To be fair, this was the first update to AmigaOS for five(?) years, updated by people who hadn't even seen the source code before. I think they did a good job, considering the circumstances. And of course 3.9 is better, as it is 3.5+bug-fixes+more.
Chris
