KThunder wrote:
i had a bag of hard candy the other day that said it was produced in a plant that handles peanuts and tree nut, which would be good to know if i was really allergic. maybe its just easier to have everyone place all possible warnings
If there is potential for the product to have come in to contact with ingredients that it does not actually contain, and to which somebody may have an allergic reaction, then I think the warning is warranted. But warning somebody that a product contains itself is just stupid, as is warning people that hot things are hot.
Any court which entertains cases like this is clearly run by idiots. And anyone who has an allergy to dairy and drinks milk not realising it contains milk deserves to have an allergic reaction. Hopefully anaphylaxis will destroy their reproductive organs before they have the chance to perpetuate their Stupid Genes.
--
moto