A c64 case is entirely and completely irrelevant to the amiga.
As I've said repeatedly on this forum, once they have an "amiga" product, then we'll see, and I've even supported giving them their own forum, alongside morph, aros etc.
This is where your faking ignorance again. I have personally explained that you you previously. You may disagree, but you definitely understand that the C64 was Commodore's predecessor to the Amiga. CUSA is claiming that they are following the same path and are going to release Amiga's also. You may disagree with what defines "Amiga", but you definitely understand the connection. You may not want to, but you do. Continuing to claim that you are incapable of seeing anyone's point of view but your own is simply trolling.
Actually,when Barry answered some of my questions on this forum in the past, it seemed pretty clear that we're talking linux plus emulation.
Anything in writing, from the company, with specifics of more than linux+vice/UAE would be welcome, and actually be relevant and interesting news.
Yes, the method that they have been talking about in providing C64 and AmigaOS compatibility is via UAE. Emulation is the ONLY way that compatibility can be achieved. Every OS that isn't on a 68K is using emulation for compatibility with the 68k. You are aware of this. Pretending like you don't understand how this relates to Amiga is beyond silly. And you can be sure that if DELL started talking big about including AmigaOS compatibility via emulation on their systems standard from the factory, they would definitely be discussed here. You may not find a manufacturer shipping systems that can run Amiga 68k code standard interesting, but claiming that you don't understand why other people do is just trolling.
If there's actual evidence that they are developing some sort of OS themselves, I'd love to see it. /that/ would actually be interesting and highly relevant.
Anyone undertaking this effort in 2011 is either loaded beyond belief with money and talent or crazy. For all we know, Barry might be both.
They have stated their plan to use Linux as a starting point. Just as Apple used BSD as a starting point. This was explained to you in the very post you responded to. You might not agree with it as a good direction to go. You might believe they will fail, but you definitely understand why there is interest in it. Pretending like you don't is simply trolling.
The truth is what is actually available for customers to buy. Nothing more. Nothing less.
So, just like a huge number of other Amiga related topics that you understand the interest in. Again, pretending to not understand is simple trolling.
So we are basing this all on future promises then?
Partially yes, although CUSA has proven that they can do at least some things that many nay sayers have claimed they could not. So, they have started to create credibilty to their claims. Of course, you are certainly aware that credibility has never had a bearing on whether something is Amiga related or not. So, trying to claim that you don't understand the relationship between CUSA and Amiga based on that is....Yep. Trolling.
You are trying to sound "Reasonable" by claiming that you are not bitching, complaining or taking sides, and that you "I am genuinely missing what possible benefit CUSA is bringing to "the brand" that isn't already available with any other PC out there". The fact is that you are bitching and complaining. It isn't that there is something anything about CUSA that you don't understand. It's that they are not pushing your particular strain of Amiga, and you don't get why everyone else doesn't just agree with you, and you feel that playing dumb makes you look better than taking the Franko route.