Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ADPro vs. ImageFX  (Read 15919 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Crom00

Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« on: February 25, 2010, 05:09:17 PM »
AdPro is great for "batch processing" Where you take entire imgages, resize them, recolor them, run a filter on them and resave them either as an image sequence.

Example of use:

Take 300 frames from lightwave rendered at 1024X768, reize them to 720X486, apply a noise filter, NTSC color filter, etc. then save the sequence of jpgs to a device like DPS par, that would compile that sequence of images into an animation that would playback in real time.

Why we needed to do this:

You have a master render of your scene at 102X768 for archiving and a "broadcast resolution" version suitable for D1/D2 Standard resolution playback.

These days Photoshop or After Effects replace BOTH ImageFX and ADPRO
Imagemaster for the Amiga was quite good as well.
 

Offline Crom00

Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2010, 10:51:16 PM »
Quote from: Vulture;545124
As you said IFX has AutoFX. There's nothing Adpro can do at this point that IFX can't, only IFX usually does it better :)


ImageFX and ADPRO run great on a USB drive and WinUAE on a Mcbook Pro. Much faster than any amiga I ever had.