AmigaOne based WebServers

[zacman]

>Other than that, there isn't anything in this April
>chip that isn't in the AmigaOne fix...

Why not tell us how and where you did test the
AmigaOne board? What did you use to test it?

[zacman]

>that makes you think that testing hardware cannot
>be done by people that actually use that hardware
>for the purpose that was intended by it?

Hyperion already was wrong the last time they said
that there are no bugs in Articia. So why should
somebody trust them this time?

[zacman]

>Do you think that testing cannot be performed by
>actually using the hardware for the purpose
>intended?

In this case yes. Because those issues happen
randomly under "normal" use but can be
reproduced under very specific conditions.

>Can you or someone else point to a link where
>Hyperion actually said precisely that?

Sure.

"Posted by Ben Hermans/Hyperion- (134.58.222.78)
on 30-Sep-2002 19:20

For the record, there is no Articia bug."

He then continues with some FUD against bplan
which I won't quote here.

[zacman]

>Actually, I claimed there would be no bug in the
>Articia's that get delivered.

Did you already get samples of this new revision and
did test them?

[zacman]

>It had been compiling stuff for hours on friday.
>Mostly the kernel, and one of our linux games, but
>over and over.

Ok, so you have not tested the board/Articia chipset
but you're just using it daily. Thanks for clarification.