Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Scan doubler subsitute A1200  (Read 2861 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline humppa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 959
    • Show all replies
Re: Scan doubler subsitute A1200
« on: May 13, 2007, 08:08:07 PM »
Quote

carvedeye wrote:
that would be so cool having one of them and its a lot cheaper than a scandoubler.


...but image quality is a lot worse (might be ok for occasionally playing games though).

@magistral

Could you please fix the link? It destroys the page layout.
 

Offline humppa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 959
    • Show all replies
Re: Scan doubler subsitute A1200
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2007, 09:49:14 PM »
@krize

or just use the URL tag
 

Offline humppa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2005
  • Posts: 959
    • Show all replies
Re: Scan doubler subsitute A1200
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2007, 08:01:42 AM »
Quote
You tryed that in particular?
Or you think all converters like that are crap? If you read the manufacturer web page, looks like its a good option.


I once tried the Aver TV Box9, but returned it after looking at the mediocre image quality. Composite looked really blurry of course and things improved only a little bit when I used the s-video input (connected via genlock).
There is nothing wrong with these devices, it's just a basic difference in signal standards. When using anything other than RGB or Component, the signal quality is severely degraded. I spend a bit more and bought the CYP CM345S which accepts RGB through SCART connectors as input.