Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Booting multiple OSes?  (Read 3028 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Oliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 803
    • Show all replies
Re: Booting multiple OSes?
« on: May 02, 2007, 10:35:19 AM »
Disclaimer: it's also a long time since I configured multibooting os's, so take my advice with a grain of salt.

Firstly, the extra RAM will definitely be helpful, and worthwhile, if you don't have to pay too much.  256 is a pretty small amount these days.

You should also consider other distros, like Xubuntu, which will feel more responsive.  There's a number of distributions targeted at producing a more responsive OS.

For your boot loader to work without the need for manual editing, you may need to install the OS's in a particular order.  I can't remember the details about this, but seem to recall the *ubuntu installer liked to have XP installed first, or the boot loader would not be properly updated with a boot entry for it.

Get ready for lots of reading with Linux distros (specially if you want to use more than one, as there are some important differences which may not be immediately apparent).  At least become comfortable with manual editing for the boot loader, as it is handy even for updates of a single Linux distro (you may get unwanted automatic entries for outdated kernals, but can't remember the details of this).  It may also be necessary for debugging boot issues.

Be prepared for hassles with drivers.  Again, more reading to be done.

Hope that helps.  I do find it useful to run Linux at home, though I don't need to do so very often.

Oli
Good good study, day day up!
 

Offline Oliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 803
    • Show all replies
Re: Booting multiple OSes?
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2007, 03:16:33 PM »
Quote

More about OSes: has anyone got experience with more Linux distros or even other OSes?

How's Solaris, for example? Is it a big and slow beast, or does it have some cool features which make it worth while to spend a partition on?


I've used Solaris on Sparcstations at uni.  It's OK for doing some high level work on, but I don't think it's very well suited for personal computing.  It's got very solid multiuser support, including remote login, and simultaneous users.  You can distribute tasks accross multiple work stations in a network.  I'm not aware of Solaris running on x86 machines, though I could be out of date on that one.

Other OS's I've used also aren't for x86 boxes, so not very useful.

Has anyone tried Yellowtab Zeta?  I was thinking of buying a copy, but never got round to it.

edit- just noticed Zeta is now defunct, as it used unlicensed Be code, and infringed copyrights.
Good good study, day day up!