Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970  (Read 5011 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« on: October 17, 2002, 11:17:12 AM »
More details on the IBM’s future PPC 970 CPU from ArsTechnica.

Click here for the article


Quote
Quoting from Arstechnica
Now for some architectural details:

L1 data cache: 32 KB
L1 instruction cache: 64 KB
L2 cache: 512K
Registers:
32 64-bit general purpose registers
32 64-bit floating-point registers
32 128-bit vector registers
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2002, 11:46:48 PM »
Both Matrox* and nVidia have yet to release their true DirectX 9 Class GPU part.
*Note that Perhelia is not a true DirectX 9, it’s merely a spring board towards that goal.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2002, 11:51:00 PM »
Quote
Offcourse the new ATI card kicks everybodies a$$, so for 3D gaming, take your pick.

For 3D Application performance, NV25 (Quadro 4 900XGL) still beats* R300 (Radon 9700).
Refer to http://www.xbitlabs.com/video/3dsmax5/

It’s interesting to note that the same NV25 chips (i.e. GF4 vs Q4GL) have different out comes due to minor driver and clock speed differences.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2002, 11:04:16 AM »
Quote
That's no surprise when running OpenGL software. The review was comparing how cards optimized for DirectX stack up against the OpenGL optimized Quadro 4 running OpenGL apps.

Regardless of the other side issues involve, the fastest "solution" for a given area is the most important for the end user.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2002, 12:07:14 PM »
Quote
Nah, i't just a tad slower the a GeForce4/4400

Nah, i't just a tad slower the a GeForce4 TI 4200.  ;-)

Refer to http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1645&p=7
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.