Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: How fast is MorphOS?  (Read 14138 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: How fast is MorphOS?
« on: August 02, 2003, 11:53:26 PM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
Believe me, MOS on Pegasos feels a lot faster than UAE on any PC, gigahertz CPU or not. Pure emulators just don't come close.

What about against a ~2.2Ghz Athlon XP, Radeon 9800 Pro, nForce 2 400 Ultra and 1Gb 400FSB DDR SDRAM (dual channel 512Mb x2)?
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: How fast is MorphOS?
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2003, 12:45:49 AM »
Deleted double post…
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: How fast is MorphOS?
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2003, 12:47:19 AM »
@downix

Quote

Quoting that you're paying a lot more for the PC

That factor was not taken into an account in regards to Kenny's post...

Memory and video card factors are variable factors (these can change with minimal impact on the emulation speed) .

Athlon XP 2700+ (~2.16Ghz)($~126), 2x PC3200 256Mb ($~36 each) and Leadtek/Chaintech ($~59) nForce2 should be cheaper than $299 USD mark.

Quote

and no guarantee you'll be faster.

Just post some benchmarks…
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: How fast is MorphOS?
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2003, 12:02:12 AM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
Oh, I didn't get a chance to thank you for finding my PC motherboard details earlier (the Quake2 thread). With your help I was able to bite the bullet and quickly pick a 512MB DIMM for the PC. It's much more responsive now (namely it no longer takes 3 minutes to load IE). Thanks!

No problems…

Just note that, a VIA KLE133(e.g. MSI-6378) will have to share its memory bandwidth with the GPU (in this case, an “Integrated Trident Blade 2D/3D video accelerator”) and the CPU.

From Sisoftware’s Sandra 2003, a VIA KLE133's memory throughput is around ~586Mb/s. A MSI-6330 V3.6 (VIA KT133A) has  a memory throughput of ~898~910Mb/s (with BIOS V3.6).

PS; A VIA KT133A reference board has a ~1012MB/s (aggressive memory timings, BIOS's settings permitting).

To illustrate the impact speed penalty in regards to memory bandwidth refer to the following scenario.
Try 'MPEG 2 (DVD resolution and quality) to Divx 5.0(~DVD resolution and quality)' conversion (via Flask) on VIA KT133A (with 512Mb 133Mhz SDRAM) vs nForce II (with 512Mb 266Mhz DDR SDRAM) (both was installed with a similar CPU i.e. Athlon XP 1800+(~@1.53Ghz)). The VIA KT133A (MSI-6330) can only reach ~12~14 Fps, while nForce II reaches +26 Fps.  

That performance gap widens farther IF the machine employs 333Mhz memory/FSB bandwidth. Of course an Athlon XP 2600+** (@~2.09Ghz) will help in that regard. **333Mhz FSB variant.

FSB and memory bandwidth may have some impact on emulation's speed.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.