Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: PPC 970 Accelerator for A1?  (Read 6378 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: PPC 970 Accellerator for A1?
« on: June 26, 2003, 01:47:30 AM »
Quote

Jose wrote:
I don't hink accelerators are allways bad. If you look at PC motherboard they 've had the same PCI bus and I/O for too much time. The major stuff that has changed was the processor, and memory controler. So why do people have to allways buy a new PCI bus, etc... with every new board?
.

Reasons for the new motherboard, i.e. the Northbridge and Southbridge cores gets updated. Certain benchmarks prove speed disparity between the chipsets (i.e. efficiencies issues) e.g. nVidia’s nForce2 vs VIA KT400.  

With nForce2’s case, its 128bit bus****, 400Mhz DDR FSB, AGP 8X Pro, Hypertransport based Southbridge and Northbridge link, DASP (Dynamic Adaptive Speculative Pre-Processor)**, integrated DSP and 'etc'.

** "an intelligent agent that monitors CPU requests and looks for access patterns that it can
successfully predict. When it recognizes such access patterns, it exploits unused memory bandwidth to load its cache with data the CPU is expected to request later". This is built into the Northbridge chip.

****Useful for concurrent DSP, GPU and CPU main bus access.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: PPC 970 Accellerator for A1?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2003, 02:15:33 AM »
Quote
what about the "Point to Point controller" which shovels data around without even bothering the CPU's and the processor bus? Isn't that even a little "Amiga-like"? Perhaps I am wrong, but I really think this is the most innovative design this far, and I have not seen this on any desktop x86 motherboard,

Have you heard of nVidia nForce series?

What you said is similar to AMD's K8 based 8xxx chipset, nVidia's K8 nForce3 Pro/ K7 nForce I/II and VIA's K8 chipsets. All of which employs AMD’s hypertransport technologies.  

The speed of FSB is not quite important, it’s the throughput bandwidth i.e. measured in Mb/s or Gb/s.

With AMD’s Opteron and Athlon 64, the speed between Northbridge and the CPU core match CPU speed. This is partly due to on-die integration.

For nForce2  market share within AthlonX86 market refer to http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2003/06/23&pages=04&seq=22
("Nvidia’s nForce2 K7 chipset dominates market")...

Note that, Hypertransport technology is also being applied for AMD’s own 64bit MIPS CPU series.  
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.