only Amigaos

[Hammer]

Redentor5 wrote:
The OS4 is the only successor of the amigaos, because we like or not, AmigaInc is now the proprietor of amiga, and everything the rest that they take out (morphos,aros in intel etc...) it is not amiga.    
That the Os4 doesn't like? That AmigaInc doesn't like? I find a good opinion (although it doesn't share it), but that this passing with morphos, aros etc.... alone it harms to amiga  because divide to the community, and if we are not now many", then we will be less.    
   
I think that the best thing for the amiga had been that they had united the forces all to take out an operating system that truly surprised in the market and not this.

I can´t cancel this postttt  :-x  :-x  :-x  :-x  :-x

Amiga Forever** is an official licenced package btw… I do recall Bernie**** having an official licence for the “Amiga X86” project.

** For the virtual machine market, just like MacOS's SoftWindows 95 product (which actually uses the real MS Windows 95 source code).

[Hammer]

The closest comparisons would be to OS/2 or Mac OS X and how they handled legacy applications (Win16/DOS for OS/2 and MacOS for Mac OS X) but that's also not completely accurate due to the nature of the AmigaOS itself.

What about Java VM sandbox model?

Does Gensisi provide press diagrams of their architecture like Microsoft’s NT Executive lectures?  

(Sorry about the mentioning Windows NT since I'm only trained in Windows NT system programming.)

Ok, where do you get your information? MorphOS is not hosted on anything. The Quark microkernel is as essential to it's operation as ExecSG is to AOS4. You seem to be implying that the ABox is an OS on it's own.

I recall there was a “A-Box kernel 68k” and “PPC Quark micro kernel”.

[Hammer]

This is probably the most complete description around: MorphOS in Detail.

Thanks for the link, but I’m already aware of this particular document.

PS It has a questionable MS Windows NT kernel modelling btw (another issue)...