re the open source things. I like to have the ability to hack on / debug/ improve software I run. open source allows me to do that.
your comment that I dont need access to the kernel to write a driver, is exactly my issue - being told what I can and can't do. I won't want to buy into software to run as my hobby machine, that is locked down to a single piece of hardware, doesnt give me the freedom to work on parts that I want. Maybe I want to work on the core os. Or maybe I don't but I would like the ability to be there. right now the "morphos" team have the power to pull the plug on the os, or refuse to replacea keyfile if hardware was to die. No thanks.
I'm not picking on just morphos. I feel the same about os4.
I realise my "views" are incompatible with the views of many "Amiga users". I realise you will continue to utilise open source that originates from other platforms, while limiting the freedom your own users have with your code.. and because of that you also limit your userbase. I'm sure that doesn't matter to you either.
Mate, if you REALLY have issues with using any software that you don`t have complete source control over then how did you ever start using an amiga?
For that matter how do you get by in daily life?
Do you demand schematics when you buy a new TV?
It is a wholly unreasonable expectation.
edit: I`ll also add that a lot of big open source projects result in a turgid mish-mash of competing ideas and lack polish. Amiga idea is based around tight code, simplicity and efficient use of resources, everything OSS isn`t . Open source MOS would be a disaster.
Threads about the direction AmigaOS and clones should take are regularly punctuated by foolish suggestions - would you give all these people source access and allow them to fork the OS every time they want support for some stupid thing?
re-edit: Would you use a parachute that had been packed by a thousand people taking turns to make one fold and each having a different view on how to pack a parachute?