Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Alans reply to Bill  (Read 20106 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SlimJim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 752
    • Show all replies
Re: Alans reply to Bill
« on: May 17, 2003, 04:16:57 PM »
It's unfortunate that Alan (if it's him) doesn't answer in the
same format as the original post - i.e. a list of events, only
biased towards his way of seeing things. It clouds the
information he wants to convey. But I suppose his point is
rather clear - according to him, the delays and setbacks Mr.
Buck presented in his list was to a big portion due to his
own rough business practices.
 
As always, just as Bill Buck talking about MAI/Terrasoft et al,
this is Alan talking about another company not his own -
something to remember when weighting the -scarce- info.
 
Alan is usually showing better verbal prowess than this though.
.
SlimJim
 

Offline SlimJim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 752
    • Show all replies
Re: Alans reply to Bill
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2003, 06:27:45 PM »
Let's hope Mr. Buck has the smarts not to reply in kind, or we'll be back in the sandbox once again.
.
SlimJim