AROS has enough OEM's that actually support the development of AROS not just milking it. If we're going to hold one company to this standard we should hold everyone to it.
I agree. It depends on how the license is worded as to whether or not they are required to however. I'm sure you are more aware of the wording of that license than I am. I've not read which restrictions are placed upon OEMs with the AROS license. If it says that OEMs must support AROS in order to distribute it, well, that's what it says and then that's what must be. My question was:
Why the perception that if you put out a free OS you can expect everyone that uses it to support it in other ways too?
Perhaps I should have said:
Are OEM distributors of AROS OS based systems required to support AROS in ways other than just increasing the user base?
...that's what I was trying to find out. My bad for not thinking through my question before typing it.
