Time for AROS and Natami ?

[Tripitaka]

kolla wrote:
I thought some of the point with Natami was to be backwards compatible for OS3.x.

It is, and IMHO should be.

Let us not forget what the Natami is  all about. In many ways it's the ultimate classic Amiga. Does it even need AROS? the idea is to use a full Amikit install, I like that.
Let's not delude ourselves, the Natami is a niche machine for enthusiast's.
It could be a thin client or netbook etc... but that being the case I ask again, does it need AROS?

I'm happy with AROS being an option but I think a full OS3.9 Amikit install is the best choice for Natami.

[Tripitaka]

It's still a worthwhile product IMHO, providing in delivers. Natami's team have been better then certain other developers in keeping us up to date. The project does at least seem to have some drive so I'll remain optimistic for now.  :-D