When I read this thread, there are two main issues discussed over and over again, which are basically
1) We want to enhance the Amiga OS (3.1 or 3.9 or whatever)
2) There are legal issues with modifying Amiga OS
and as a derivative of the first point there's Thomas Richters wish to accomplish enhancements in a cooperative/coordinated/project way (which seems a very valid argument to me by the way)
"We" is already difficult in this. Just see the different approaches of Cosmos and Thomas. But could "we" (the community) negotiate the rights to enhance our beloved OS?
"We" could be defined by the different forum members of the different Amiga sites as a start. As I start to think of it, it sounds a bit like democracy to me.... mmm, scary.
Anyway, my point is that I would like to see the Amiga OS evolve. And I'd prefer the way in which we have more happy faces and that keeps the community together. Please keep talking with each other.
