Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)  (Read 10762 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)
« on: November 07, 2011, 12:51:41 AM »
I personally use AROS, but if you just want a 68k Amiga machine... Then I would put some variant of Windows (whatever you can get for free) on there then set it up to auto boot directly into WinUAE.
Then at a later date, when you want something more, move your setup to AROS :)

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Amithlon VS WinUAE VS AROS question (OS 3.9 related)
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2012, 06:18:20 PM »
Quote from: psxphill;674319
Why would you set a processor intensive process to realtime? I guess you had multiple cores or your machine would just become unresponsive.
 
If you did the same thing on amigaos then be prepared to wait until the process finishes before you can click on anything.
+1

Some people are really confused about priorities and how to use them :-/