Tension wrote:
arkpandora wrote:
Well, good question - I mean good answer.
Not as far as I'm concerned, as if I don't receive any answer I will buy one, and if the answer is "Yes" I would only wait because I already have what I need - that is a classic Amiga. Anyway I don't think that waiting potential customers had any influence in the Amiga's destiny, as they are not a distinguishing feature of the Amiga, or only as a consequence of other factors, which as far as I'm concerned were and would still be a reason to buy an Amiga.
Fair enough. I was just remembering a rant that CU Amiga Magazine had in it`s last issue. It was basically blaming A500 owners who didn`t upgrade as the cause of Amiga development stopping. I would agree with that statement.
It was the users fault, by sticking with the A500, software developers would generally target 1985 technology... But the big problem was Commodore using the same Technology from the first to the last Amiga... Had C= locked into a 6month product cycle (though very ambitious for the early 90s) then things would have been better...
