0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
According to Reuters, the big idea is being squashed by the military and Congress who have not spend enough on getting directed energy to the front. Some military officials say more needs to be done to assure the international community that directed-energy weapons set to stun rather than kill will not harm noncombatants.Ironically while the weapons might not kill people are being delayed, soldiers are having to use weapons that definitely do kill them.
Author
Topic: Weapons that might kill are more dangerous than ones that do... (Read 2736 times)
