Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: 68040 particularities  (Read 2712 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AmigaManceTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 1278
    • Show all replies
68040 particularities
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:21:07 PM »
Hello.
 I have notice a couple of things since i upgraded from a Blizzard 1230IV at 50mhz to a BlizzardPPC with a 68040 at 25mhz CPU:
 First, is that the 68040 appears to be MUUUUCH more cache-depended for its performance. For example, if you disable both caches on a 68030 it will become slower of course, but still retain a relatively decent performance. If you do the same on a 68040, it becomes extremely slow. it feels like a 68020/14mhz or even slower.
  Ok, i know that the caches of a 68040 are larger, but that doesn't explain it. Is there a technical reason for this?
 
 My second observation is that the speed benefit of moving from a 68030/50 to a 68040/25 is minimal. Sometimes hardly noticed. Perhaps because of the particularly limited memory bandwith of the BPPC? (IF this is not just a rumour)
A1200 PPC user.
 

Offline AmigaManceTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 1278
    • Show all replies
Re: 68040 particularities
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2006, 01:11:04 PM »
Quote
Quote
AmigaMance wrote:

My second observation is that the speed benefit of moving from a 68030/50 to a 68040/25 is minimal. Sometimes hardly noticed. Perhaps because of the particularly limited memory bandwith of the BPPC? (IF this is not just a rumour)

 What tasks are you performing to observe this? When I switched from 030/25MHz to 040/35MHz the speed difference was obvious in CPU intensive tasks like file packing/unpacking, image conversion

 We can not compare dissimilar things. Your case is much different from mine.
A1200 PPC user.