MorphOS statement about its legal status

[Ivan]

>I don't get what Thendic think they will accomplish with this statement.

It's FUD.

(for those who dont know, FUD=Fear Uncertainty and Disinformation)


Ivan

[Ivan]

>Shouting "illegal" in public forums without ever delievering any
>proof is unfair competition, and if AInc/Ben can't proove
>their accusations then they can be sued over them.

I remember Thendic calling it an Amiga, then an NG Amiga, then an
Amiga replacement. etc etc etc. Thendic's been backpeddeling the
whole way and HAS given the impression that its an Amiga system.

As for MOS and what sources were used, you can speculate all you
want in favour of the MOS side, its still just speculation and
MOS still only offers legacy emulation. Nothing new here people,
use UAE or Amithilon. It's alot cheaper for legacy compatability
and alot more work has been put into them. UAE has been around for
years.


P.S. Kronos, stop with the 'the name' bullsh!t trolling already.

Ivan

[Ivan]

>Sure it's all specualtion, and thats all we've seen in the last years.
>Both MOS and OS4 will start with legacy emulation (no/few
>native apps) and will try to move ahead from there.

True enough.

>So Amithlon/UAE will be the most sensible choice of all three
>in the near future.

Unless of course you want the latest version of the OS. If you wan't
emulators for outdated versions they are available. I hear you can
emulate old versions of MACOS on Amiga's too. I'd rather have a MAC
to use MAC apps though. Wouldn't you?

>will be far more than 0.4.

Was that a typo or are you some kind of fanatic who has to bash
anything Amiga whenever he can?

Ivan

[Ivan]

>I think he was referring to MorphOS V0.4 and saying that the V1.0 will be much different.

My mistake, i apologize.