Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Some 2.04?  (Read 6699 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jkirk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 911
    • Show all replies
Re: Some 2.04?
« on: September 27, 2005, 05:17:48 PM »
@Narayan

i don't know why you are still in the dark ages. i chunked 2.04 many many moons ago on my a500. now i switch between 1.3 and 3.1.  :-)


BTW: there is nothing wrong with 2.04 but 3.1 has more features. and newer os distributions require 3.1 (Well except 4.0 but that is a different story). :-D
The only stupid question is a question not asked.  


Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can\'t stand one bit of competition.
 

Offline jkirk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 911
    • Show all replies
Re: Some 2.04?
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2005, 01:46:05 PM »
i don't understand you. it sounds in your post like you are taking a dig at me because i posted something you didn't agree with. if that is true DON'T POST someone will always have differing opinions. if this is not true then i apologize for reading too much into that post.

you seem to think 3.1 was not finished. tell me what is not complete. 3.1 IS 2.04/2.1 with additional features that are supported today whereas 2.x is not supported by progs using these features (such as datatypes.)

now if you want to believe that 2.X is better go ahead i won't stop you. i was giving the opinion most users have concerning these two os versions. 3.5 and 3.9 are the stopgap versions of amiga os which was 3.1 with bundled 3rd party software.

The only stupid question is a question not asked.  


Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can\'t stand one bit of competition.
 

Offline jkirk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 911
    • Show all replies
Re: Some 2.04?
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2005, 05:18:44 PM »
 :lol:

yea the only reason i used 1.3 was for old games. for anything else i used 3.1.
The only stupid question is a question not asked.  


Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can\'t stand one bit of competition.