*MOS GOOD, AOS 4 BAD*
You keep repeating that, but I don't think I've ever said anything like that.
I guess if I had thousands tied up in underpowered computer hardware and software, I'd be defensive too.
If you guys are this bad with only the SAMs to tout (unless you count the Pegasos, a MorphOS machine, which is your highest performer), how bad is it going to get when the X1000 is finally introduced?
If a G5 Mac outperforms it, can you get whinier still?
My PC and any modern PC outperforms them all so noone buying anything to run either MOS or AOS does it for the sake of raw performance, I thought that was clear by now.
The concusion of what you write is just that, *MOS GOOD, AOS 4 BAAD* . Sure there are lists of text of why but that is the only point you're trying to make all the time and good luck with that, I don't agree.
Also SAMs got PCI-E, faster RAM if I'm not mistaken compared to the Peg 2. And all of those are new which I prefer if I can afford it. The option of buying a secons hand sam, amigaone, pegasos 2 isn't all that bad if you're short on money and otherwise you can buy something new which always feels better when it comes to computers.
And really, I couldn't care less. If the MOS team had a X1000 coming up I would've very much wanted one. Actually I wouldn't even mind if you did, it's not the OS that I have issues with it is some of its users. This is like a sect or something.
Like I wrote, you only makes it worse on yourselves. If you where... well friendly, open minded and... normal(?) then MOS would've been much more appealing. As it is now and has been for the past 10 years I wouldn't want to be a part of that community even if I got the hardware and OS for free and as you can see by the size of your userbase I'm not alone. Good luck and good night :-)