Consequences of the AmigaOS 3.1 source code "leak", one year after?

[fishy_fiz]

I've said this many, many times....
AROS is OS3.1 compatible. This doesn't mean "restricted to".
Exactly the same as MOS or OS4. It has its own advantages and disadvantages vs the other "NG" options, much as the reverse is true.
Some people know this and just like to repeat it like some sort of weird mantra, others simply aren't aware of this.
You all know which group you fall into.

[fishy_fiz]

Oh, absolutely. And I agree there.
I had no qualm with your post at all.
A certain other person however has been spewing the same old crap for years.
It gets tiring given he knows what the story is and does it still for some bizarre reason.
He seems to think (or at least pretends to so he can troll and antagonize) a lack of Reaction  in some AROS archs means AROS is 3.1 compatible only with no other ambitions. This is despite the fact he's been told many times that reaction and class act work on 68k AROS, and there's an openreaction that has had little interest shown due to a lack of interest in Reaction apps (and because there's next to nothing that uses reaction that inspires it to be worked on).