What is it you think Moore's law has to do with netburst exactly? Moore's law is based on performance, not clock rates. Additionally x86 has been risc like for many years. The multiple micro ops idea has been in practice for about a decade. Also, contrary to what you've suggested clock rates are becoming a focus again (not soley, but equally to core count). Devil's Canyon modifications support this, as does the fact you can buy x86 cpus whose stock frequencies are 5ghz. Why would A-eon make a board supporting 16* the memory the os its designed for?
No offense intended, but your post reads like something strung together by someone who's trying to sound more informed than they are. More holes than solid.
