Weird issue with Amiga 600

[fishy_fiz]

This whole thing is ridiculous.
We've both got different experiences and opinions and they dont match, so freaking what? Most people can agree to disagree. We argued for a while, these things happen.
My qualm is with the fact you cant seem to let it go.
Despite the fact you keep dismissing anything I offer because of a lack of "proof" we've both offered similar "proof" (ie., nothing but sharing our respective experiences). The difference being however that you persisted as I stopped taking it anything resembling serious.

And no, thus far it appears you cant have an "intelectual conversation". It seems your take on that is to say that youre right over and over, offering no proof and burying your head in the sand to any facts if they dont match your experiences. As I keep saying its not a black or white topic.
The only absolutes here are:
A. A classic amiga wont push either an ide or a cf card to anything near its potential (apart from old ide drives)
B. seek times *are* much better with a CF card. I challenge you to find *any* reference that says otherwise and share it.

Just curious, what speed CF cards have you used? Theyve come quite a way in recent times. My 32gig CF card is roughly %30 faster than my 120gig ide drive (with 8meg cache) both using pfs.

This is my last attempt at diplomacy, either continue to carry on like a pork chop, or try your hand at behaving like an adult, your choice.

[fishy_fiz]

Being a bad loser would require having lost. I havent.
Cant say Im surprised to see you responding this way though. When a person cant prove themselves, or if theyve been disproved and dont want to admit it they tend to behave this way. I tried my hand at diplomacy and extended an olive branch a few times, you showed everyone that youre not simply *acting* like a pork chop.

Cant show me any reference to your claims then I guess? If you was as confident as youre pretending you'd jump at the chance to prove me wrong, but instead took the aggressive response option.

As for my claims, take your pick of options from this page:
http://www.google.com.au/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=ide+vs+cf+seek+times&oq=ide+vs+cf+seek+times&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_nf=1&gs_l=hp.3...1844.5250.0.5453.20.11.0.0.0.0.1047.3203.3-1j6-2j1.4.0.3BtFXlBiR00&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=ccf7218a2aefdb07

You obviously have nothing to contribute other than the whole head-in-the-sand/repeat-something-without-offering-anything-to-back-it-up/ignore-facts type input youve offered so far, so I think I'll go back to responding to anything you write with nonsensical gibberish.

[fishy_fiz]

Yes, hundreds of links from hundreds of individuals. Not one of them supporting your claims and all supporting mine. Versus your offering *nothing* at all but words. Doesnt take a rocket scientist to see who's claims are emptier.

Flash RAM has next to zero seek time, its pretty common knowledge.

If/when you have something of any substance at all to offer I'll respond, but until then you'll have to resort to arguing with yourself. There's absolutely no point in continuing this arguement as things stand.

[fishy_fiz]

Seven year old link. Irrelevant. CF cards are orders of magnitudes times faster today.