void CllFnc(void);
PrcTgs[0].ti_Tag = NP_Entry;
My Opinion:
Are we influenced by awkward Unix naming convention perhaps ? :roll:
Nowadays I see other operating systems with clear, fully descriptive, and rationally named APIs, something Amiga should've done long ago, why do certain amiga programmers insist on going the unix convetion way ?
Why not just..
void CallFunction( void );
..
newProcessTags[ 0 ].ti_Tag = NP_Entry;
..?
Just to expand, things like:
window->RPort vs screen->RastPort
struct RastPort vs struct RasInfo (without a "t")
struct RasInfo vs struct Layer_Info (with an underscore)
:-?
And these are just a few of the annoyances.
Just my opinion, no more rants lol.
