Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die  (Read 3817 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« on: January 23, 2005, 02:25:10 PM »
Great article. Very inspirational, and informative. :-o
 

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2005, 08:23:56 PM »
Quote:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The original Amiga had 4 bits each for hue (H), saturation (S), and luminance (L)--a color representation that mapped elegantly to the NTSC video signal. To make the best use of this representation, Miner developed a special hold-and-modify mode, in which data would tell the video output chip how to alter the H, S, or L values from the previous pixel on the screen; it could display subtly shaded images with remarkable realism.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
While the essence of the Amiga's design--the NTSC-synchronous clock and coprocessor circuitry--was elegant, turning it into a working high-volume product was another matter.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

There's that word, elegant, again! Durn, I wonder why those 'old-time' programmers and system developers use it so much, when describing the Amiga's efficient design and implementation, which, by the way, gave it such amazing processing powers, on such a limited budget of resources? Sounds like a post I myself wrote, some time ago, which tried to prove that exact point - that such an approach, logically carried into the future, would have had a highly evolved Amiga still at the vanguard of computer technology...
 

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2005, 11:51:35 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
Quote

Holley wrote:
Amigo - the trouble with elegance is that scaling it (compared to a brute force solution) is much harder.  For the jumps that Amiga made in technology PCs would go through 100 small developments in every area.


It's the Evolution vs Revolution argument... Revoltion will get you ahead the quickest but not very far, Evolution will get you further and take an easier route but take longer


I choose EVOLUTION! Its worked for us (human bings). It aught to work for what we create. 'Natural selection by Order of Intelligence'. Has a nice ring to it, I'm tink!  :lol:
 

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2005, 11:55:10 PM »
Quote

Holley wrote:
Amigo - the trouble with elegance is that scaling it (compared to a brute force solution) is much harder.  For the jumps that Amiga made in technology PCs would go through 100 small developments in every area.


Believe it or not, I agree, almost...
We would need those "100 small devlopments in every area", as you say, or one really creative, smart person, or group of people to figure it all out again, just as they did with the Amiga. We have the technology, and the smarts. I say let's go for it. Isn't that part of the mentality that got us the Amiga in the first place? The steps would be the same as before: Concieve a radical new design on paper, (or, paradoxically, on a PC, how's that for irony?), build a mock-up, work out some more of the bugs, build a prototype, MAKE it more do-able, and more marketable, then pitch the idea to the money-guys, or create financial backing somehow (fill in miracle here), then head to market. And remember, the very first step (conceive and design) don't cost nothin'.
 

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2005, 01:14:03 AM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
Quote

MiAmigo wrote:
Quote

bloodline wrote:
Quote

Holley wrote:
Amigo - the trouble with elegance is that scaling it (compared to a brute force solution) is much harder.  For the jumps that Amiga made in technology PCs would go through 100 small developments in every area.


It's the Evolution vs Revolution argument... Revoltion will get you ahead the quickest but not very far, Evolution will get you further and take an easier route but take longer


I choose EVOLUTION! Its worked for us (human bings). It aught to work for what we create. 'Natural selection by Order of Intelligence'. Has a nice ring to it, I'm tink!  :lol:


Exactly!! The Amiga was a Revolution... the PC is an Evolution.


 :lol: That type of 'evolution' was what gave us the dinosaurs. Brute force, big asses! Hey, wait a minute, that DOES indeed describe PC 'evolution'. Now, all we need is a 'mass extinction'.  :lol:
 

Offline MiAmigo

  • Arbiter of Succession
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 391
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga: The Computer That Wouldn't Die
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2005, 01:15:09 AM »
I'm not 100% familiar with the Nintendo story. What happened, anyways? :-?