Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Workbench 1.x era apps and music video  (Read 2867 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline danwoodTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 485
    • Show all replies
Workbench 1.x era apps and music video
« on: March 10, 2010, 01:33:53 AM »
Little video I just knocked up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPT7SmVEpjc

1.x era apps, I'll do 2.x and 3.x soon, any suggestions for apps I should show in those?

Also, top marks for whoever can name all the games/mods? :)
 

Offline danwoodTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 485
    • Show all replies
Re: Workbench 1.x era apps and music video
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2010, 01:04:13 PM »
Quote from: ChaosLord;547143
@Danwood

WOW!  That was the best Amiga video ever!  :knuddel:  :bowdown:

Please make another one with the following progs:
Hippoplayer
Prowrite 3.3 (that was my fave word processor back in the olden days)
Audition 4 (The BEST sample editor from way back.  Show a sample in the editor and zoom in / out on it.  It has supersmooth zoomscrolling!)
SCALA: u didn't show a real scala presentation.  Why not?  SCALA is awesome.
U should have loaded a text document into CED to show the hyperfast scrolling.


Thanks for the feedback Chaoslord :)  

Yeah some of the apps had to be rushed, as Youtube only allows 10 minute videos, and when I got to Scala there was only something like 2 mins left and I really wanted to show a few more.  

I will do a 2.x and 3.x video though and demo Scala MM 200 properly, and take note of the apps you mentioned, some great suggestions there :)
 

Offline danwoodTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 485
    • Show all replies
Re: Workbench 1.x era apps and music video
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2010, 01:04:49 PM »
Quote from: haywirepc;547131
Nice video...
 
Windows 3.1 could multitask... Really shitty and slow but it technically could.
 
 
Steven


Yeah, maybe I should have worded it "windows could not multitask properly/like this until 1995"