Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What next for NASA  (Read 6214 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show all replies
Re: What next for NASA
« on: February 03, 2005, 10:01:46 AM »
Hell no! NASA, ESA, and the Russians all have other veichles for sending ISS-components into orbit, it's just that it's too bloody expensive!

I think that if the U.S. truly are going to aim for mars, then there have to be made investments in some alternative for the shuttles; a craft capable of going to Mars would have to be built in orbit either around Earth, or around the moon.
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show all replies
Re: What next for NASA
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2005, 09:24:54 AM »
@ Cecilia

The pacemaker was a Swedish invention, not a NASA one! Besides that, I agree with you. :-P
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show all replies
Re: What next for NASA
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2005, 09:24:25 PM »
@Cecilia

True! Science leads to progress, and space exploration is all about science.
Beating the dead horse since 2002.