Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?  (Read 4991 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xeron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 2533
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.petergordon.org.uk
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« on: January 07, 2004, 02:49:54 PM »
You've been using dir cache on hard disks for the last 10 years? Oops :-)
Playstation Network ID: xeron6
 

Offline xeron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 2533
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.petergordon.org.uk
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2004, 03:19:14 PM »
Well, using FFS for 10 years isn't necessarily sad; its the standard, it has well tested salvage tools etc. but dir cache shouldn't ever be used on hard disks.
Playstation Network ID: xeron6
 

Offline xeron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 2533
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.petergordon.org.uk
Re: Recommended filesystem replacement for FFS... SFS or PFS?
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2004, 04:34:23 PM »
Well, dir cache is an attempt to make reading directories a little faster. It kind of makes sense on floppy disks, but on hard disks it gives no gain, but causes more pain.

Using FFS-DC on hard disks takes up space on the disk, uses more RAM, and makes the already annoying validation process take a lot longer.

A more detailed description is in this publically readable CAM article by Olaf Barthel. Scroll down to section 1.6.
Playstation Network ID: xeron6