Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which System Is Better?  (Read 6831 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: Which System Is Better?
« on: December 29, 2010, 06:42:46 PM »
As Iggy wrote, GHz alone don't tell too much. A P4 (Netburst) roughly counts 2/3 of it's clockspeed against more modern CPUs. The 5/7 y.o. machine probably is single core as well, it's slower in every respect than the C2D. Plus it's hotter and noisier - stay clear.
 

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: Which System Is Better?
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2010, 07:54:19 PM »
Quote from: KThunder;602712
IIRC p4s have a 31 stage pipe. core  has a 14 stage pipe. so the p4 would have to be at least twice as fast or 3.6 ghz, to be better than the core. you are a ghz off this.


Actually, it's not that easy. As fishy_fiz stated, a longer pipeline doesn't perform slower or faster by itself. Its per clock throughput may be exactly the same as a shorter pipeline, but its latency will be higher. Since a longer pipeline makes smaller steps it holds the potential for higher clockrates.

OTOH a longer pipeline is bad because when speculative execution misses, it needs to be flushed and reloaded - which will take longer for a longer pipeline until the first command finishes off.