Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A600 maximum (stock) performance and PAL/NTSC  (Read 5327 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: A600 maximum (stock) performance and PAL/NTSC
« on: August 25, 2010, 09:40:57 AM »
NTSC mode isn't any faster. It may appear so when software is timed by vertical blanking only. Running NTSC screens in PAL mode (with a blank bar at the bottom) may speed things up a bit since there's less bitmap DMA going on, increasing Blitter time and CPU time for DMA intense graphic modes.

(Yes, a real NTSC machine really is a tiny bit faster (7.16 vs 7.09 MHz CPU clock), but this isn't noticable and can't be changed by switching to NTSC video timing.)

As to "switches on NTSC but gives full PAL height resolution" I don't understand what you mean. The difference in NTSC and PAL (amiga-wise) is the number of horizontal lines thus screen height.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2010, 08:55:23 PM by Zac67 »
 

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: A600 maximum (stock) performance and PAL/NTSC
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2010, 10:29:25 PM »
Quote from: brownb2;577755
  • Got my desktop at 8 colour NTSC High Res Laced with an overscan of 698x558 (bizarrely it uses slightly less memory than PAL but more of my monitor when overscan'd!).
M8, hate to tell ya - NTSC has exactly 525 scan lines, so there's absolutely no way to overscan beyond that...