Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Apollo 1240 vs. A3640  (Read 2309 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: Apollo 1240 vs. A3640
« on: November 18, 2008, 07:27:42 AM »
The A3640's 'design flaw' is that it's completely missing local RAM. It was designed as the "cheapest '040 board known to man", the only way to get it past C= management (otherwise the A4000 would've got an '030). As you can see from the names on the board, Dave Haynie wasn't one of the developers.
 

Offline Zac67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 2890
    • Show all replies
Re: Apollo 1240 vs. A3640
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2008, 07:33:47 AM »
Quote
alexh wrote:

His name is all over the source code to the A3640 PAL (programmable logic chips). I just think he wasn't involved in the PCB design.

That's true. But I do remember him ranting about the A3640, something in the line of 'a poor man's '040'. Probably he got involved when it came to integrating all the 4000's components.