Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Word Vs Word Perrrfect  (Read 3048 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ilwrath

Re: Word Vs Word Perrrfect
« on: June 23, 2009, 09:54:32 PM »
It's so funny how everyone has an opinion on how a word processor should work.

For Amiga, I *LOVED* Final Writer.  Everything just fell into place, and it had some nice features like the integrated dictionary/thesaurus that other entries never did do quite as elegantly.

For Windows, I tolerated Microsoft Office 97, 2000, 2003, and Open Office.  I can beat them into submission and get a reasonable document, however, it always feels more like I am battling the software than using it.

I actually like Microsoft Office 2007 a lot.  The rethink on the interface is really well done, and I seem to find everything where I'd expect to.  I find that I swear at it a lot less than I did at previous Office versions.  

In fact, I think I may have actually developed a new way to rate word processors.  I propose the ACWUPD score.  (Average Cuss Words Uttered Per Document)  :lol: