@ mikrucio
Ummm, I don't know what specs you're looking at, but you're wrong. Most PS3 games so far would fit on a DVD-9, only a select few have required more space than that (usually 13ish gb).
The PS3 has LESS ram available for processing - the 360 has a much better architecture - this is the reason why developers are complaining about the PS3. The Cell processor is more often than not underused simply because it's hard to program for, and this is why third party games will not take advantage of it (similar to why the GC/Xbox got so many PS2 ports last gen).
The PS3 DOES NOT have out of the box 1080p video - it doesn't even come with component cables - buy a $699AU machine and you get composite video cables. Yay.
Also, I have yet to see a decent first party game from Sony on the PS3. I HAVE seen good first/second party games on the 360.
The short of it is this: The PS3 is a much more reliable, quieter system with the bonus of having a built-in Blu Ray drive. It's more expensive and doesn't come with decent cables, but it's a solid piece of equipment.
The 360 on the other hand is less reliable (aided somewhat by a 3yr warranty), cheaper and has many more games and a much better online system. These are not my opinions, they are facts.
:-)